Authors: Malcolm P. North; Jonathan T. Kanec; Van R. Kanec; Gregory P. Asnerd; William Berigane; Derek J. Churchillc; Scott Conway; R.J. Gutiérreze; Sean Jeronimoc; John Keanea; Alexander Koltunovf; Tina Markh; Monika Moskalc; Thomas Muntoni; Zachary Peerye; Carlos Ramirez; Rahel Sollmann; Angela White; Sheila Whitmore
Restoration of western dry forests in the USA often focuses on reducing fuel loads. In the range of the spotted
owl, these treatments may reduce canopy cover and tree density, which could reduce preferred habitat conditions
for the owl and other sensitive species. In particular, high canopy cover (≥70%) has been widely reported
to be an important feature of spotted owl habitat, but averages of stand-level forest cover do not provide important
information on foliage height and gap structure. To provide better quantification of canopy structure, we
used airborne LiDAR imagery to identify canopy cover in different height strata and the size and frequency of
gaps that were associated with owl nest sites, protected activity centers (PACs), and territories within four study
areas and 316 owl territories. Although total canopy cover was high in nest stands and PAC areas, the cover in
tall (> 48 m) trees was the canopy structure most highly selected for, while cover in lower strata (2–16 m) was
avoided compared to availability in the surrounding landscape. Tall tree cover gradually decreased and lower
strata cover increased as distance increased from the nest. Large (> 1000 m2) gaps were not found near nests,
but otherwise there was no difference in gap frequencies and sizes between PACs and territories and the surrounding
landscape. Using cluster analysis we classified canopy conditions into 5 structural classes and 4 levels
of canopy cover to assess the relationship between total canopy cover and tree size within nest sites, PACs, and
territories. High canopy cover (≥70%) mostly occurs when large tree cover is high, indicating the two variables
are often confounded. Our results suggest that the cover of tall trees may be a better predictor of owl habitat than
total canopy cover because the latter can include cover in the 2–16 m strata – conditions that owls actually
avoid. Management strategies designed to preserve and facilitate the growth of tall trees while reducing the
cover and density of understory trees may improve forest resilience to drought and wildfire while also maintaining
or promoting the characteristics of owl habitat.